Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Vs Traditional

Minimally invasive total knee replacement uses a smaller incision than a traditional knee replacement so it may lead to less pain and decreased recovery time.

Minimally invasive hip replacement vs traditional.

There are pros and cons to traditional hip replacement when compared with minimally invasive hip replacement. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions. This incision extends into the quadriceps tendon which provides the surgeon good. That is the damaged portion of the hip is removed and replaced it with an implant.

The hip is a ball and socket type joint. For these two types of surgeries the general procedure that takes place is the same. Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery. When performing a traditional knee replacement initially the surgeon makes an 8 to 10 inch vertical incision over the front of the knee to expose the joint.

The goal of using shorter incisions is to reduce pain and speed recovery. Using a standard approach a surgeon can transition to a minimally invasive approach by gradually shortening the incision to 4 inches or less. A minimally invasive total hip replacement uses a smaller cut incision than a traditional total hip replacement. It is not yet clear whether the procedure leads to an increased risk of certain complications though.

In the hip joint the rounded head of the thigh bone the femoral head moves smoothly inside the round socket of the hip bone. A variation of this approach is a minimally invasive procedure in which one or two shorter incisions are used. Proponents of minimally invasive hip replacement say small incision operations can lessen blood loss ease post operative pain trim hospital stays improve scar appearance and speed healing. The traditional surgical approach to total hip replacement uses a single long incision to view and access the hip joint.

It also uses special tools. The surrounding soft tissue is separated to allow access and visibility of the hip joint. 1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients. Minimally invasive vs traditional knee replacement surgery traditional knee replacement surgery.